Religions | |
Religious Values in Liberal Democracy | |
EmilyR. Gill1  | |
[1] Derpartment of Political Science Emerita, Bradley University, 1501 W Bradley Ave, Peoria, IL 61625, USA; | |
关键词: religious freedom; religious liberty; pluralism; Christian nationalism; freedom of conscience; alternatives; | |
DOI : 10.3390/rel11120682 | |
来源: DOAJ |
【 摘 要 】
Religious values neither wholly threaten nor wholly reinforce the stability of liberal democracy. This depends upon how they may be interpreted and applied. The recent influence of Christian nationalists, who would promote a specific interpretation of Christianity as the only legitimate basis for public policy, and of those who would elevate religious liberty above all other rights, does not promote pluralism. Although people should be able to live out their religious commitments, it is the state, not individuals or private organizations, that must draw the line between the free exercise of religion and the civil rights of those who may be adversely affected by the religious exercise of others. First, religious rights may threaten other rights, particularly when reinforced with public funds. Second, religion makes valuable contributions to pluralism when it protects the conscientious beliefs and practices of individuals and of minority religious groups. Finally, concerning LGBT civil rights, individual religious believers should be accommodated as much as possible, but their organizations should be required to arrange for others without objections to provide services that are sought. Religion’s greatest contribution occurs when it is allied with movements that enhance individual rights, including but not limited to the free exercise of religion.
【 授权许可】
Unknown