期刊论文详细信息
Molecules
Prediction of Intact N-Glycopeptide Retention Time Windows in Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography
Tomas Krizek1  Petr Kozlik1  Zuzana Bosakova1  Katarina Molnarova1  Tomas Jecmen2 
[1] Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 8, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic;Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Hlavova 8, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic;
关键词: glycoproteomics;    glycopeptides;    glycopeptide separation;    haptoglobin;    hemopexin;    hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography;   
DOI  :  10.3390/molecules27123723
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Analysis of protein glycosylation is challenging due to micro- and macro-heterogeneity of the attached glycans. Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) is a mode of choice for separation of intact glycopeptides, which are inadequately resolved by reversed phase chromatography. In this work, we propose an easy-to-use model to predict retention time windows of glycopeptides in HILIC. We constructed this model based on the parameters derived from chromatographic separation of six differently glycosylated peptides obtained from tryptic digests of three plasma proteins: haptoglobin, hemopexin, and sex hormone-binding globulin. We calculated relative retention times of different glycoforms attached to the same peptide to the bi-antennary form and showed that the character of the peptide moiety did not significantly change the relative retention time differences between the glycoforms. To challenge the model, we assessed chromatographic behavior of fetuin glycopeptides experimentally, and their retention times all fell within the calculated retention time windows, which suggests that the retention time window prediction model in HILIC is sufficiently accurate. Relative retention time windows provide complementary information to mass spectrometric data, and we consider them useful for reliable determination of protein glycosylation in a site-specific manner.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:2次