期刊论文详细信息
Forest Science and Technology
Forest-based livelihood choices and their determinants in Western Kenya
Eucabeth Majiwa1  Purity Yego1  Robert Mbeche1  Josiah Ateka1 
[1] Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology;
关键词: livelihoods;    forest extraction;    rural households;    double hurdle model;    kenya;   
DOI  :  10.1080/21580103.2020.1870577
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Forest extraction is an important livelihood activity for millions of low-income households in rural areas of developing countries. Understanding the choices households make to extract forest products can help formulate strategies for preventing livelihood strains associated with forest degradation. This article evaluates the nature, extent and determinants of forest extraction among rural households in western Kenya. Data were obtained from a survey of 924 randomly selected households in the Mt. Elgon area in western Kenya. The level of forest extraction was measured as the aggregate value of products extracted, while a Double Hurdle model was applied to assess the factors influencing forest extraction. The results show that the choice to engage in forest-based livelihood was generally higher among households with lower asset value, membership in forest user associations, and headed by males. The results further show that although the majority of households’ engaging in forest-based livelihood were of the lowest wealth category, households in the middle wealth category were found to extract higher value products. Institutional characteristics, including access to agricultural markets, credit, extension, and membership to forest user groups, increased the likelihood of households’ extracting higher value products. Overall, the results show that in addition to asset endowment, other contextual factors, such as access to markets, agricultural extension, and membership to farmer groups defined whether a household extracted forest products for survival or accumulation.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次