Which injured patients with moderate fibrinogen deficit need fibrinogen supplementation?

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Kenji Inaba¹  Marie-Odile Geay-Baillat²  Pascal Incagnoli³  Arnaud Friggeri⁴  Olivia Vassal⁴  Aline Lambert⁴  Jean-Stephane David⁴  Xavier-Jean Taverna⁵ 

[1] Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, LAC + USC Medical Center, University of Southern California;Laboratoire d’Hémostase, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon;Service des Urgences – SAMU, Hôpital Universitaire de Dijon;Service d’anesthésie-réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon;Service d’anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon;

关键词: ROTEM;    Fibrinogen;    Trauma;    Coagulopathy;    Shock;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13049-021-00988-x

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background In severely injured patients, fibrinogen supplementation is recommended when fibrinogenemia is < 1.5 g L−1, but some teams have suggested to use higher thresholds (fibrinogenemia < 2.0 g L−1 or FIBTEM clot amplitude at 5 min (A5) values < 11 mm). The goal of this study was to specify in patients with a moderate fibrinogen deficit (MFD) whether some admission characteristics would be associated with fibrinogen administration at 24 h. Methods Prospective analysis of retrospectively collected data from a trauma registry (01/2011–12/2019). MFD-C was defined by a fibrinogenemia 1.51–1.99 g L−1 or the corresponding FIBTEM-A5 values (MFD-A5) that were determined from linear regression and ROC curve analysis. Administration of fibrinogen were described according to the following admission parameters: shock index (SI) > 1, hemoglobin level < 110 g L−1 (HemoCue®), and base deficit > 5 mEq L−1. Data are expressed as count (%), median [IQR]. Results 1076 patients were included in the study and 266 (27%) had MFD-C, among them, 122/266 (46%) received fibrinogen. Patients with MFD-C who received fibrinogen were more severely injured (ISS: 27 [19–36] vs. 24 [17–29]) and had more impaired vital signs (base deficit: 5.4 [3.6–7.8] vs. 3.8 [2.0–6.0]). Linear regression analysis found a positive correlation between fibrinogen level and FIBTEM-A5 (r: 0.805). For a fibrinogen level < 1.5 g L−1 and < 2.0 g L−1, FIBTEM-A5 thresholds were 6 mm (sensitivity 85%, specificity 83%, AUC: 0.934) and 9 mm (sensitivity 84%, specificity 69%, AUC: 0.874), respectively. MFD-A5 values (185 (27%) patients) were defined as a FIBTEM-A5 between 7 and 9 mm. More than 50% of MFD-C patients presenting a SI > 1, a hemoglobin level < 110 g L−1, or a base deficit > 5.0 mEq L−1 received fibrinogen. The relative risk [95% CI] for fibrinogen administration (SI > 1) were 1.39 [1.06–1.82] for MFD-C, and 2.17 [1.48–3.19] for MFD-A5. Results were not modified after adjustment on the ISS. Conclusions We have shown in this study an association between shock parameters and fibrinogen administration. Further studies are needed to determine how these parameters may be used to guide fibrinogen administration in trauma patients with MFD.

【 授权许可】

Unknown