Conceptual and empirical problems with game theoretic approaches to language evolution

Frontiers in Psychology

Jeffrey Watumull¹  Marc D. Hauser² 

[1] Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of CambridgeCambridge, UK;Risk-Eraser, West FalmouthMA, USA;

关键词: language evolution;    evolutionary game theory;    communication;    universal grammar;    models;    theoretical;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00226

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The importance of game theoretic models to evolutionary theory has been in formulating elegant equations that specify the strategies to be played and the conditions to be satisfied for particular traits to evolve. These models, in conjunction with experimental tests of their predictions, have successfully described and explained the costs and benefits of varying strategies and the dynamics for establishing equilibria in a number of evolutionary scenarios, including especially cooperation, mating, and aggression. Over the past decade or so, game theory has been applied to model the evolution of language. In contrast to the aforementioned scenarios, however, we argue that these models are problematic due to conceptual confusions and empirical difficiences. In particular, these models conflate the comptutations and representations of our language faculty (mechanism) with its utility in communication (function); model languages as having different fitness functions for which there is no evidence; depend on assumptions for the starting state of the system, thereby begging the question of how these systems evolved; and to date, have generated no empirical studies at all. Game theoretic models of language evolution have therefore failed to advance how or why language evolved, or why it has the particular representations and computations that it does. We conclude with some brief suggestions for how this situation might be ameliorated, enabling this important theoretical tool to make substantive empirical contributions.

【 授权许可】

Unknown