Arthroscopic microfracture with atelocollagen augmentation for osteochondral lesion of the talus: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Hong Seop Lee¹  Ki Won Young¹  Hyong Nyun Kim²  Jin Su Kim³  Young Koo Lee⁴  Whi-Je Cho⁴ 

[1] Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University;Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine;Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sejong Sports Medicine and Performance Center;Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital;

关键词: Ankle;    Arthroscopy;    Atelocollagen;    Microfracture;    Osteochondral lesion;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12891-020-03730-3

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background We aimed to evaluate whether arthroscopic microfracture with atelocollagen augmentation could improve the clinical outcomes and quality of regenerated cartilage in patients with osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT). We hypothesized that the clinical outcomes and quality of the regenerated cartilage would be superior in patients undergoing arthroscopic microfracture with atelocollagen augmentation compared to those undergoing arthroscopic microfracture alone. Methods In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 60 patients were randomly allocated to two groups: arthroscopic microfracture with atelocollagen augmentation (group 1, n = 31) and arthroscopic microfracture alone (group 2, n = 29). Mean 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), Hannover scoring system (HSS), and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores were assessed 2 years postoperatively and compared between the groups. The quality of the regenerated cartilage was assessed according to the Magnetic Resonance Observation of CArtilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score based on magnetic resonance imaging. Results Forty-six patients (22 in group 1, 23 in group 2) completed the 2-year follow-up. The quality of the regenerated cartilage assessed based on the MOCART score was significantly superior in group 1 compared to group 2 (64.49 ± 18.27 vs 53.01 ± 12.14, p = 0.018). Clinical outcomes in terms of 100-mm VAS (17.25 ± 20.31 vs 19.37 ± 18.58, p = 0.72), HSS (93.09 ± 13.64 vs 86.09 ± 13.36, p = 0.14), and AOFAS (91.23 ± 8.62 vs 86.91 ± 10.68, p = 0.09) scores were superior in group 1 compared to group 2, but the differences were not statistically significant. Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical outcomes compared with the preoperative values. Conclusion The quality of the regenerated cartilage was superior after arthroscopic microfracture with atelocollagen augmentation compared to that after microfracture alone in patients with OLT. Clinical outcomes assessed 2 years postoperatively were superior in patients who underwent arthroscopic microfracture with atelocollagen augmentation compared to those who underwent arthroscopic microfracture alone, although the differences were not statistically significant. A long-term study of the cohort is required to confirm these findings. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02519881 ), August 11, 2015.

【 授权许可】

Unknown