The need for adaptable global guidance in health systems strengthening for musculoskeletal health: a qualitative study of international key informants

Global Health Research and Policy

Helen Slater¹  Andrew M. Briggs¹  Saurab Sharma²  James J. Young³  Deborah Kopansky-Giles³  Lyn March⁴  Joanne E. Jordan⁵  Carmen Huckel Schneider⁶  Swatee Mishrra⁷ 

[1] Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University;Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences;Department of Research, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College;Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital;HealthSense (Aust) Pty Ltd;Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney;Sydney Musculoskeletal, Bone & Joint Health Alliance, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney;

关键词: Global health;    Disability;    Rehabilitation;    Musculoskeletal;    Strategy;    Systems strengthening;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s41256-021-00201-7

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions, MSK pain and MSK injury/trauma are the largest contributors to the global burden of disability, yet global guidance to arrest the rising disability burden is lacking. We aimed to explore contemporary context, challenges and opportunities at a global level and relevant to health systems strengthening for MSK health, as identified by international key informants (KIs) to inform a global MSK health strategic response. Methods An in-depth qualitative study was undertaken with international KIs, purposively sampled across high-income and low and middle-income countries (LMICs). KIs identified as representatives of peak global and international organisations (clinical/professional, advocacy, national government and the World Health Organization), thought leaders, and people with lived experience in advocacy roles. Verbatim transcripts of individual semi-structured interviews were analysed inductively using a grounded theory method. Data were organised into categories describing 1) contemporary context; 2) goals; 3) guiding principles; 4) accelerators for action; and 5) strategic priority areas (pillars), to build a data-driven logic model. Here, we report on categories 1–4 of the logic model. Results Thirty-one KIs from 20 countries (40% LMICs) affiliated with 25 organisations participated. Six themes described contemporary context (category 1): 1) MSK health is afforded relatively lower priority status compared with other health conditions and is poorly legitimised; 2) improving MSK health is more than just healthcare; 3) global guidance for country-level system strengthening is needed; 4) impact of COVID-19 on MSK health; 5) multiple inequities associated with MSK health; and 6) complexity in health service delivery for MSK health. Five guiding principles (category 3) focussed on adaptability; inclusiveness through co-design; prevention and reducing disability; a lifecourse approach; and equity and value-based care. Goals (category 2) and seven accelerators for action (category 4) were also derived. Conclusion KIs strongly supported the creation of an adaptable global strategy to catalyse and steward country-level health systems strengthening responses for MSK health. The data-driven logic model provides a blueprint for global agencies and countries to initiate appropriate whole-of-health system reforms to improve population-level prevention and management of MSK health. Contextual considerations about MSK health and accelerators for action should be considered in reform activities.

【 授权许可】

Unknown