Habermas, Taylor, and Connolly on Secularism, Pluralism, and the Post-Secular Public Sphere

Religions

Spyridon Kaltsas¹ 

[1] Department of Political Science and Public Administration, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 106 78 Athens, Greece;

关键词: post-secular society;    secularism;    public sphere;    pluralism;    legitimation;    ethics of citizenship;    Jürgen Habermas;    Charles Taylor;    William Connolly;   

DOI  :  10.3390/rel10080460

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The main purpose of this paper is to explore and understand the relationships between secularism, pluralism, and the post-secular public sphere in the thought of Jürgen Habermas, Charles Taylor, and William Connolly. The three authors develop a thorough critique of secularism which implies a radical break with the dogmatic idea of removing religion from the public sphere. My main objective is to show that this critique is related to a normative understanding of our post-secular situation and requires a rethinking of the boundaries of the public sphere in relation to the predicament of pluralism. Arguing against the post-metaphysical conception of secularism, Taylor develops a critique of Habermas’s “institutional translation proviso”, and Connolly stresses the agonistic dimension of the post-secular public sphere. I take these criticisms into account, while arguing that Taylor and Connolly are unable to provide a sound basis for the legitimacy of our institutional settings. In contrast to Taylor and Connolly, I propose a reading of Habermas’s theory based on the internal relationship between universal justification and the everyday contexts of pre-political solidarity. I conclude with a focus on the need to take into account the agonistic dimension of the post-secular public sphere.

【 授权许可】

Unknown