Social Infrastructure to Integrate Science and Practice: the Experience of the Long Tom Watershed Council

Ecology and Society

Courtland L. Smith¹  John P. Bolte²  Dana C. Dedrick³  Cynthia A. Thieman⁴  Rebecca L. Flitcroft⁵ 

[1] Department of Anthropology, Oregon State University;Department of Biological and Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University;Long Tom Watershed Council Executive Director;Long Tom Watershed Council Restoration Director;USDA Forest Service;

关键词: habitat restoration;    Oregon;    science and practice;    social infrastructure;    watershed management;    water quality;    watershed councils;    watershed organizations;   

DOI  :  10.5751/ES-03231-140236

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Ecological problem solving requires a flexible social infrastructure that can incorporate scientific insights and adapt to changing conditions. As applied to watershed management, social infrastructure includes mechanisms to design, carry out, evaluate, and modify plans for resource protection or restoration. Efforts to apply the best science will not bring anticipated results without the appropriate social infrastructure. For the Long Tom Watershed Council, social infrastructure includes a management structure, membership, vision, priorities, partners, resources, and the acquisition of scientific knowledge, as well as the communication with and education of people associated with and affected by actions to protect and restore the watershed. Key to integrating science and practice is keeping science in the loop, using data collection as an outreach tool, and the Long Tom Watershed Council's subwatershed enhancement program approach. Resulting from these methods are ecological leadership, restoration projects, and partnerships that catalyze landscape-level change.

【 授权许可】

Unknown