Atrial fibrillation future clinic. Novel platform to integrate smart device electrocardiogram into clinical practice

Cardiovascular Digital Health Journal

Kathy Wolski, MS¹  Patrick Tchou, MD, FHRS²  Walid Saliba, MD²  Thomas Callahan, MD, FHRS²  Khaldoun G. Tarakji, MD, MPH, FHRS²  Daniel Cantillon, MD, FHRS²  Oussama Wazni, MD, FHRS²  Niraj Varma, MD, PhD²  Mandeep Bhargava, MD²  John Rickard, MD, MPH²  Ayman Hussein, MD, FHRS²  David Martin, MD²  Thomas Dresing, MD²  Divyang Patel, MD²  Mohamed Kanj, MD²  Mina K. Chung, MD, FHRS²  Bryan Baranowski, MD²  Cameron T. Lambert, MD²  Joseph M. Bumgarner, MD³ 

[1] C5Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio;Departments of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio;University of North Carolina-Rex Hospital, Raleigh, North Carolina;

关键词: Atrial fibrillation;    Digital health;    ECG monitoring;    mHealth;    Remote monitoring;    Telehealth;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Background: Direct-to-consumer devices allow patients to record electrocardiograms (ECG) and detect atrial fibrillation (AF). Clinical adoption of these devices has been limited owing to the lack of efficient workflow. Objective: To assess a new care model for following patients after AF ablation that uses a smartphone ECG coupled with a novel cloud-based platform. Methods: This was a pilot study to describe AF detection, healthcare utilization, use of additional ECGs and cardiac monitors, and changes in anxiety after AF ablation. Patients presenting 3–4 months after early successful AF ablation were randomized into a control group with standard clinical follow-up or a self-monitoring group using smartphone ECG (Kardia Mobile, KM) coupled with a cloud-based platform (KardiaPro, KP) that alerted the physician when AF was detected and followed for 6 months Results: A total of 100 patients were randomized: 51 to the KM/KP group and 48 to the control group (1 withdrew). AF was detected in 18 patients (18.2%), 11 (21.6%) in the KM/KP group and 7 (14.6%) in the control group (P = .42). AF detection occurred at a median of 68 and 91 days in the KM/KP and control groups, respectively (P = .93). These differences were not statistically significant. Healthcare utilization and changes in anxiety were similar between the groups. More patients required additional ECGs or cardiac monitors in the control group (27.1%) compared to the KM/KP group (5.9%) (P = .004). Conclusions: Smartphone ECG with a cloud-based platform can be incorporated into the care of post–AF ablation patients without increasing anxiety and with less need for additional traditional monitors.

【 授权许可】

Unknown