Agriculture | |
Modelling Soil Water Content in a Tomato Field: Proximal Gamma Ray Spectroscopy and Soil–Crop System Models | |
Domenico Solimando1  Stefano Anconelli1  Marco Bittelli2  Giulia Villani2  Marica Baldoncini3  Vincenzo Guidi3  Barbara Fabbri3  Enrico Chiarelli3  KassandraGiulia Cristina Raptis3  Fabio Mantovani3  Carlo Bottardi3  Matteo Albéri3  Virginia Strati3  Fausto Tomei4  | |
[1] Consorzio Bonifica CER, Via Masi 8, 40137, Bologna, Italy;Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences (DISTAL), University of Bologna, Viale Fanin 44, 40127 Bologna, Italy;Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Ferrara, Via Saragat 1, 44121 Ferrara, Italy;Servizio Idro-Meteo-Clima di Bologna Agenzia Regionale Prevenzione, Ambiente ed Energia, Via Po 5, 40139 Bologna, Italy; | |
关键词: soil water content; proximal gamma ray spectroscopy; soil–crop system models; real-time soil water content monitoring; non-destructive methods; CRITeRIA; AquaCrop; IRRINET; tomato crop; | |
DOI : 10.3390/agriculture8040060 | |
来源: DOAJ |
【 摘 要 】
Proximal soil sensors are taking hold in the understanding of soil hydrogeological processes involved in precision agriculture. In this context, permanently installed gamma ray spectroscopy stations represent one of the best space–time trade off methods at field scale. This study proved the feasibility and reliability of soil water content monitoring through a seven-month continuous acquisition of terrestrial gamma radiation in a tomato test field. By employing a 1 L sodium iodide detector placed at a height of 2.25 m, we investigated the gamma signal coming from an area having a ~25 m radius and from a depth of approximately 30 cm. Experimental values, inferred after a calibration measurement and corrected for the presence of biomass, were corroborated with gravimetric data acquired under different soil moisture conditions, giving an average absolute discrepancy of about 2%. A quantitative comparison was carried out with data simulated by AquaCrop, CRITeRIA, and IRRINET soil–crop system models. The different goodness of fit obtained in bare soil condition and during the vegetated period highlighted that CRITeRIA showed the best agreement with the experimental data over the entire data-taking period while, in presence of the tomato crop, IRRINET provided the best results.
【 授权许可】
Unknown