Effects of High-Intensity Interval vs. Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Hui Liu¹  Zhaowei Kong²  Yan Wang³  Tian Yue³  Fengxue Qi⁴ 

[1] China Institute of Sport and Health Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China;Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau, China;School of Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China;Sports, Exercise and Brain Sciences Laboratory, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China;

关键词: cardiovascular disease;    cardiac rehabilitation;    high-intensity interval training;    peak oxygen uptake;    cardiorespiratory fitness;    moderate-intensity continuous training;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fcvm.2022.845225

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundStudies have shown that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is superior to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for increasing peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. To our knowledge, previously published systematic reviews have neither compared different HIIT models with MICT nor investigated intervention frequencies of HIIT vs. MICT for purposes of improving cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CVD.ObjectiveThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the effects of different training models, intervention frequencies and weeks of HIIT vs. MICT on changes in cardiorespiratory fitness during cardiac rehabilitation (CR).MethodsA systematic search was carried out for research articles on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus databases for the period up to December 2021. We searched for RCTs that compared the effect of HIIT vs. MICT on cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CVD.ResultsTwenty-two studies with 949 participants (HIIT: 476, MICT: 473) met the inclusion criteria. Sensitivity analysis revealed that HIIT increased VO2peak more than MICT (MD = 1.35). In the training models and durations, there was a greater increase in VO2peak with medium-interval HIIT (MD = 4.02) and more than 12 weeks duration (MD = 2.35) than with MICT. There were significant improvements in VO2peak with a HIIT frequency of 3 times/week (MD = 1.28). Overall, one minor cardiovascular and four non-cardiovascular adverse events were reported in the HIIT group, while six non-cardiovascular adverse events were reported in the MICT group.ConclusionHIIT is safe and appears to be more effective than MICT for improving cardiorespiratory fitness in patients with CVD. Medium-interval HIIT 3 times/week for more than 12 weeks resulted in the largest improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness during CR.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245810, identifier: CRD42021245810.

【 授权许可】

Unknown