Epidemiological risk factors for clinical malaria infection in the highlands of Western Kenya

Malaria Journal

Walters M. Essendi¹  Maxwell G. Machani²  Andrew K. Githeko²  Eugenia Lo³  Yaw A. Afrane⁴  Guofa Zhou⁵  Guiyun Yan⁵  Anne M. Vardo-Zalik⁶ 

[1] Biological Sciences Department, Egerton University;Climate and Human Health Research Unit, Centre for Global Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute;Department of Biological Sciences, University of North Carolina at Charlotte;Department of Medical Microbiology, College of Health Sciences, University of Ghana;Program in Public Health, College of Health Sciences, University of California;The Pennsylvania State University;

关键词: Malaria risk factors;    Case–control study;    House design;    Clinical malaria;    Western Kenya;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12936-019-2845-4

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Understanding the complex heterogeneity of risk factors that can contribute to an increased risk of malaria at the individual and household level will enable more effective use of control measures. The objective of this study was to understand individual and household factors that influence clinical malaria infection among individuals in the highlands of Western Kenya. Methods This was a matched case–control study undertaken in the Western Kenya highlands. Clinical malaria cases were recruited from health facilities and matched to asymptomatic individuals from the community who served as controls. Each participant was screened for malaria using microscopy. Follow-up surveys were conducted with individual households to collect socio-economic data. The houses were also checked using pyrethrum spray catches to collect mosquitoes. Results A total of 302 malaria cases were matched to 604 controls during the surveillance period. Mosquito densities were similar in the houses of both groups. A greater percentage of people in the control group (64.6%) used insecticide-treated bed nets (ITNs) compared to the families of malaria cases (48.3%). Use of ITNs was associated with lower level of clinical malaria episodes (odds ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.39–0.68; P < 0.0001). Low income was the most important factor associated with higher malaria infections (adj. OR 4.70). Use of malaria prophylaxis was the most important factor associated with less malaria infections (adj OR 0.36). Mother’s (not fathers) employment status (adj OR 0.48) and education level (adj OR 0.54) was important malaria risk factor. Houses with open eaves was an important malaria risk factor (adj OR 1.72). Conclusion The identification of risk factors for clinical malaria infection provides information on the local malaria epidemiology and has the potential to lead to a more effective and targeted use of malaria control measures. These risk factors could be used to assess why some individuals acquire clinical malaria whilst others do not and to inform how intervention could be scaled at the local level.

【 授权许可】

Unknown