期刊论文详细信息
BMC Nursing
Bibliometric mapping of intensive care nurses’ wellbeing: development and application of the new iAnalysis model
Rebecca J. Jarden1  Richard J. Siegert2  Margaret Sandham3  Jane Koziol-McLain3  Ajit Narayanan4 
[1] Present Address: Department of Nursing, Melbourne School of Health Sciences;School of Clinical Sciences and School of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies, Auckland University of Technology (AUT);School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology (AUT);School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences (D-75), Auckland University of Technology;
关键词: Bibliometrics;    Critical care nurses;    Intensive care unit;    Text analytics;    Wellbeing;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12912-019-0343-1
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Intensive care nurse wellbeing is essential to a healthy healthcare workforce. Enhanced wellbeing has widespread benefits for workers. Bibliometrics enables quantitative analysis of bourgeoning online data. Here, a new model is developed and applied to explore empirical knowledge underpinning wellbeing and intensive care nurse wellbeing in terms of size and impact, disciplinary reach, and semantics. Methods Mixed methods bibliometric study. Firstly, a new model coined ‘iAnalysis’ was developed for the analysis of published data. Secondly, iAnalysis was applied in two studies to examine wellbeing and ICU nurse wellbeing. Study one explored data from a title search with search terms [wellbeing OR well-being], identifying 17,543 records with bibliographic data. This dataset included 20,526 keywords. Of the identified records, 10,715 full-text manuscripts were retrieved. Study two explored data from a topic search with search terms [(intensive OR critical) AND (nurs*) AND (wellbeing OR well-being)], identifying 383 records with bibliographic data. This dataset included 1223 author keywords. Of the identified records, 328 full-text manuscripts were retrieved. Results Once data were collected, for size and impact, WoS Clarivate Analytics™ and RStudio™ were used to explore publication dates, frequencies, and citation performance. For disciplinary reach, RStudio™ (with the Bibliometrics™ package & Vosviewer™ plugin) was used to explore the records in terms of country of publication, journal presence, and mapping of authors. For semantics, once the bibliographic data was imported to RStudio™ (with the Bibliometrics™ package & Vosviewer™ plugin) keyword co-occurrences were identified and visualised. Full-text manuscripts were imported to NVivo™ to explore word frequencies of both the keywords and full-text manuscripts using the word frequency search. For both studies, records were predominantly published in the past 5 years, in English language, and from USA. The highest keyword co-occurrence for study one was “health and well-being”, and for study two, “family and model”. Conclusions Terms commonly associated with ‘illbeing’, as opposed to ‘wellbeing’, were highly prevalent in both study datasets, but more so in intensive care nurse wellbeing data. Intensive care nurse wellbeing was virtually absent in this literature. The iAnalysis model provided a practice-friendly tool to explore a large source of online published literature.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次