期刊论文详细信息
| Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture | |
| The Doomsday Argument Reconsidered | |
| Jon Mills1  | |
| [1] Gordon F. Derner School of Psychology, Adelphi University; | |
| 关键词: doomsday argument; doomsday clock; climate change; nuclear warfare; techno warfare; terrorism; existential risk studies; | |
| DOI : 10.14394/eidos.jpc.2020.0035 | |
| 来源: DOAJ | |
【 摘 要 】
In our current unstable world, nuclear warfare, climate crises, and techno nihilism are three perilous clouds hovering over an anxious humanity. In this article I examine our current state of affairs with regard to the imminent risk of nuclear holocaust, rapid climate emergencies destroying the planet, and the cultural and political consequences of emerging technologies on the fate of civilization.In the wake of innumerable existential threats to the future of our world, I revisit the plausibility of the Doomsday Argument, which predicts the end of human existence.
【 授权许可】
Unknown