Selecting, implementing and evaluating patient-reported outcome measures for routine clinical use in cancer: the Cancer Care Ontario approach

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes

The Cancer Care Ontario Patient Reported Outcome Advisory Committee¹  Nicole Montgomery²  Monika Krzyzanowska²  Michael Brundage³  Claire Snyder⁴  Susan J. Bartlett⁵  Denise Bryant-Lukosius⁶  Lisa Barbera⁷  Doris Howell⁸  Lesley Moody⁸  Zahra Ismail⁹ 

[1] ;Cancer Care Ontario;Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario;Johns Hopkins University;McGill University;McMaster University;Tom Baker Cancer Centre;University Health Network;Women’s College Hospital;

关键词: Patient-reported outcome measures;    Clinical care;    Routine care;    Recommendations;    Symptom management;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s41687-020-00270-1

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background The use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in routine clinical care can help ensure symptoms are identified, acknowledged and addressed. In 2007, the provincial cancer agency, Cancer Care Ontario, began to implement routine symptom screening with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) for ambulatory cancer patients. Having had a decade of experience with ESAS, the program developed a strategic interest in implementing new and/or additional measures. This article describes the development of a streamlined PROM selection and implementation evaluation process with core considerations. Methods Development of the PROM selection and implementation evaluation process involved analysis of quantitative and qualitative data as well as consensus building through a multi-stakeholder workshop. Core PROM selection considerations were developed through a literature scan, review and refinement by a panel of methodological experts and patient advisors, and testing via a test case. Core PROM implementation evaluation considerations were developed through analysis of PROM evaluation frameworks, and review and refinement by a committee of provincial implementation leads. Results Core PROM selection considerations were identified under three overarching themes: symptom coverage, usability and psychometric properties. The symptom coverage category assesses each PROM to determine how well the PROM items address the most prevalent and burdensome symptoms in the target patient population. The usability category aims to assess each measure on characteristics key to successful implementation in the clinical setting. The psychometric properties category assesses each PROM to ensure the data collected is credible, meaningful and interpretable. A scoring system was developed to rate PROM performance by assigning a grade of “weak”, “average” or “good” for each category. The process results in a summary matrix which illustrates the overall assessment of each PROM. Implementation evaluation considerations were identified under three overarching concepts: acceptability, outcomes, and sustainability. A consensus building exercise resulted in the further identification of patient, provider, and clinic specific indicators for each consideration. Conclusion To address the need for a systematic, evidence-based approach to selection, implementation and evaluation of PROMs in the clinical setting, Cancer Care Ontario defined a process with embedded core considerations to facilitate decision-making and encourage standardization.

【 授权许可】

Unknown