期刊论文详细信息
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Essential Medicines at the National Level: The Global Asthma Network’s Essential Asthma Medicines Survey 2014
Eamon Ellwood1  Innes Asher1  Philippa Ellwood1  Chen-Yuan Chiang2  Christophe Perrin3  Nils Billo4  the Global Asthma Network Study Group5  Karen Bissell6  Guy B. Marks7  Asma El Sony8 
[1] Department of Paediatrics: Child and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand;Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 116, Taiwan;Farmalex, 75008 Paris, France;Independent Consultant, 80220 Joensuu, Finland;Membership of the Global Asthma Network Study Group is provided in the Acknowledgements.;School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand;South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2085, Australia;The Epidemiological Laboratory (Epi-Lab), for Public Health and Research, Khartoum, Sudan;
关键词: essential medicines;    access;    noncommunicable diseases;    asthma;    inhaled corticosteroids;    bronchodilators;    national reimbursement list;   
DOI  :  10.3390/ijerph16040605
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Patients with asthma need uninterrupted supplies of affordable, quality-assured essential medicines. However, access in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is limited. The World Health Organization (WHO) Non-Communicable Disease (NCD) Global Action Plan 2013–2020 sets an 80% target for essential NCD medicines’ availability. Poor access is partly due to medicines not being included on the national Essential Medicines Lists (EML) and/or National Reimbursement Lists (NRL) which guide the provision of free/subsidised medicines. We aimed to determine how many countries have essential asthma medicines on their EML and NRL, which essential asthma medicines, and whether surveys might monitor progress. A cross-sectional survey in 2013–2015 of Global Asthma Network principal investigators generated 111/120 (93%) responses—41 high-income countries and territories (HICs); 70 LMICs. Patients in HICs with NRL are best served (91% HICs included ICS (inhaled corticosteroids) and salbutamol). Patients in the 24 (34%) LMICs with no NRL and the 14 (30%) LMICs with an NRL, however no ICS are likely to have very poor access to affordable, quality-assured ICS. Many LMICs do not have essential asthma medicines on their EML or NRL. Technical guidance and advocacy for policy change is required. Improving access to these medicines will improve the health system’s capacity to address NCDs.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次