期刊论文详细信息
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
A meta-analysis of health effects of randomized controlled worksite interventions: Does social stratification matter?
Hanno Hoven1  Johannes Siegrist1  Diego Montano2 
[1] ;“Work Stress Research”, Life-Science-Center, Faculty of Medicine, Düsseldorf University, Merowingerplatz 1a, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.;
关键词: body mass index;    musculoskeletal disease;    body mass index;    worksite intervention;    socioeconomic position;    randomized controlled intervention;    randomized controlled worksite intervention;    social stratification;    fruit and vegetables consumption;    review;    musculoskeletal disorder;    meta-analysis;    socioeconomic status;    musculoskeletal symptom;    job stress;    intervention;   
DOI  :  10.5271/sjweh.3412
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to assess what types of socioeconomic positions (SEP) are being considered in randomized controlled intervention studies and estimate the moderation of SEP in workplace intervention effects on body mass index (BMI), fruit and vegetable consumption, musculoskeletal symptoms, and job stress. METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled workplace interventions was undertaken. Studies were classified by participants’ SEP. The overall standardized mean difference (SMD) for each outcome was estimated with random-effects models. Additionally, a random-effects model with SEP as moderating variable was calculated in order to assess intervention effect modification (EM). RESULTS: This review covers 36 studies. Altogether 40 reports of intervention effects were considered. The overall mean differences in the models, without SEP as moderating variable, were significant for all outcomes. BMI, self-reported musculoskeletal symptoms, and self-reported job stress decreased [SMD -0.16, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) -0.29– -0.02, SMD -0.32, 95% CI -0.51– -0.14, and SMD -0.37, 95% CI -0.71– -0.04, respectively], whereas daily consumption of fruit and vegetables increased (SMD 0.12, 95% CI 0.01–0.22). There were no statistically significant differences between occupational classes for the health outcomes considered (SMD -0.102, 95% CI -0.264–0.060, EM -0.141, 95% CI -0.406–0.125; SMD 0.117, 95% CI -0.049–0.282, EM 0.000, 95% CI -0.230–0.231; SMD -0.301, 95% CI -0.494– -0.107, EM -0.369, 95% CI -1.169–0.430; and SMD -0.200, 95% CI -0.524–0.124, EM -0.598, 95% CI -1.208–0.012, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Workplace interventions can achieve small positive effects on major health outcomes. We could not confirm whether these effects are moderated by occupational class.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:4次