Challenges in reading the Greek philosophers

Metaphysik

Behnaz Aghili Dehkordi¹  Hossein Kalbasi Ashtari² 

[1] PHD student, Allameh Tabataba&039;i University, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages Philosophy department, Tehran, Iran;

关键词: Greek philosophy;    Presocratics;    Fragment;    Doxography;    Doxa;    Testimonies;    Placita;   

DOI  :  10.22108/mph.2017.93003.0

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Although Presocratics in 600 B.C founded new research ways in science and philosophy, wrote the first scientific essays, introduced basic conceptions of deduction, and abandoned mythological explanations, all we have of their works is but the fragments in the works of further doxographers, biographers, historians or philosophers who brought their statements between their own words. This would sometimes result in misunderstanding the presocratics’ purposes. Hermann Diels in his Doxographi Graeci raised a new method for dealing with doxography tradition. Diels’ new approach to doxography returned all this tradition to Aristotle’s pupil, Theophrastus. Some scholars like Jaap Mansfield criticized his disregard for the sophists like Gorgias and Hippias, and the successions of philosophers. According to his criticism, some matters like the Sophists’ influence on Plato, Aristotle’s definition of Doxa in the Placita and the influence of the succession and interpretation tradition on doxogtaphy are more noteworthy than Diels has thought.

【 授权许可】

Unknown