Is there Verification in Theology?

Open Theology

Allen Paul L.¹ 

[1] Concordia University, Montréal, Canada;

关键词: theological method;    doctrine;    bernard lonergan;    ernan mcmullin;    j. wentzel van huyssteen;    verification;    pragmatism;    nancey murphy;    retroduction;    explanation;    judgment;   

DOI  :  10.1515/opth-2017-0033

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Critical realism (CR) has served as a benchmark in science-theology dialogue as a way of determining similar rational structures in these disciplines. One implication has been that Theology has a parallel form of verification to that of the natural sciences. However, defenders of CR in Theology have not clarified how this might be the case and so critics of CR have noted numerous alleged shortfalls in thinking of Theology objectively from a pragmatist perspective. This paper describes some of these criticisms, especially the more nuanced perspective of J. Wentzel van Huyssteen, whose concern for hermeneutics and epistemology is well suited to CR. Taking several cues from the theory of retroduction in the work of philosopher of science Ernan McMullin and the philosopher theologian Bernard Lonergan, this paper proposes a more explanatory form of CR that takes hermeneutical issues seriously while also retaining a cognitive focus on judgment. It is the capacity to judge, in the form of verified theories in science and theological doctrines, where a true parallel exists between theology and the natural sciences. The paper ends by noting a number of themes in Lonergan’s magnum opus Method in Theology, where theological doctrines are capable of being explanatorily true whilst remaining subject to revision, analogous to the status of verified theories in the natural sciences.

【 授权许可】

Unknown