Sravnitelʹnaâ Politika | |
The Problem of Levels of Analysis in the Theory of International Relations: on the Way Towards Ontological Obligations? | |
I. D. Loshkariov1  | |
[1] Russian Foreign Ministry; | |
关键词: theory of international relations; levels of analysis; inter-level interactions; social ontology; ontological obligations; | |
DOI : 10.24412/2221-3279-2021-10036 | |
来源: DOAJ |
【 摘 要 】
In the modern theory of international relations there are several fundamental problems, the discussion and comprehension of which, in fact, sets the trajectory of further development of theoretical schools. This article is devoted to one of such problems which is often defined as the problem of levels of analysis. At the initial stage of the scientific discussion, the levels of analysis were perceived as a research tool, the use of which does not limit or oblige the researcher. This tool made it possible to more clearly identify a group of determining factors of the behavior of international players. However, this interpretation of the levels of analysis turned out to be excessively static, which reduced the attractiveness of this tool for research. An important breakthrough was the idea of «weaker components» at different levels, which are more susceptible to influence from other levels of analysis. In the second stage of the discussion, as the studies of the inter-level and intra-level dynamics proceeded, it turned out that the most important aspect of the problem of levels of analysis is the content of interactions. And the identification of meaningful elements of interactions explicitly or implicitly implies an appeal to the issues of social epistemology and ontology, which has led to the identification of a new layer of contradictions and conceptual forks within the problem of levels of analysis. The third stage of the discussion on the problem of levels of analysis has only just begun with major contribution from constructivism. At the present stage, the problem of levels of analysis retains its significance for research methodology as well as for the epistemology and ontology of IR studies. The article summarizes the achievements and shortcomings of each stage of the scientific discussion on the problem of levels of analysis and offers some promising new areas for further theorizing.
【 授权许可】
Unknown