An empirical and philosophical exploration of clinical practice

Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine

Donald Boudreau¹  Abraham Fuks²  Michael Saraga³ 

[1] Center for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University;Department of Medicine, McGill University;Liaison Psychiatry, Lausanne University Hospital;

关键词: Clinical practice, Patient experience;    Hermeneutic phenomenology;    Qualitative research;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13010-019-0072-9

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Previous empirical work among physicians has led us to propose that clinical practice is experienced by clinicians as an engagement-in-the-clinical-situation. In this study, we pursue our exploration of clinical practice ‘on its own terms’ by turning to the experience of patients. Methods Phenomenological analysis of in-depth individual interviews with 8 patients. Results We describe the patient experience as a set of three motifs: the shock on the realization of the illness, the chaos of the health care environment, and the anchor point provided by an engaged physician. We draw on Heidegger’s notion of solicitude to show that patients are actively ascertaining the physician’s engagement in their care. Conclusions These findings lead us to question the classical “dual discourse” of medicine that offers a dichotomous account of clinical practice as the addition of care to cure, art to science, humanism to technique, and person to medical case. We found no such distinctions in our empirical investigation of clinical practice. Rather, in our synthesis, practice appears as a unitary experience. The physician’s solicitude for the patient entrains engagement in the clinical situation. Moreover, the solicitous, engaged physician constitutes an anchor point for the patient.

【 授权许可】

Unknown