Assessing CALIOP-Derived Planetary Boundary Layer Height Using Ground-Based Lidar

Remote Sensing

Ali Omar¹  Tomoaki Nishizawa²  Atsushi Shimizu²  Man-Hae Kim³  Do-Hyeon Park³  Huidong Yeo³  Soojin Park³  Sang-Woo Kim³ 

[1] NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 23681, USA;National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan;School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea;

关键词: planetary boundary layer (PBL);    CALIOP;    CALIPSO;    ground-based lidar;    wavelet covariance transform (WCT) method;   

DOI  :  10.3390/rs13081496

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Coincident profiles from the space-borne and ground-based lidar measurements provide a unique opportunity to estimate the planetary boundary layer height (PBLH). In this study, PBLHs derived from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) were assessed by comparing them with those obtained from the ground-based lidar at Seoul National University (SNU) in Korea for both day and night from 2006 to 2019, and sounding data. CALIOP-derived PBLHs using wavelet covariance transform (WCT) are generally higher than those derived from the SNU lidar for both day and night. The difference in PBLH tends to increase as the signal-to-noise ratio for CALIOP decreases. The difference also increases as aerosol optical depth increases, implying that the PBLH estimated from CALIOP could be higher than that determined from the SNU lidar because of the signal attenuation within the aerosol layer under optically thick aerosol layer conditions. The higher PBLH for CALIOP in this study is mainly attributed to multiple aerosol layers. After eliminating multilayer cases, the PBLHs estimated from both the lidars showed significantly improved agreement: a mean difference of 0.09 km (R = 0.81) for daytime and 0.25 km (R = 0.51) for nighttime. The results from this study suggest that PBL detection using CALIOP is reliable for daytime if multilayer cases are removed. For nighttime, PBLHs derived from the SNU lidar and CALIOP showed a relatively large difference in frequency distribution compared with sounding data. It suggests that further investigations are needed for nighttime PBLHs, such as investigations about discriminating the residual layer and the difference between lidar-derived PBLH based on the aerosol layer and thermally derived PBLH from radiosonde data for the stable boundary layer during the nighttime.

【 授权许可】

Unknown