Quality in intensive care units: proposal of an assessment instrument

BMC Research Notes

Antônio Augusto Moura da Silva¹  Alexandre Guilherme Ribeiro de Carvalho¹  Renato Vieira Gomes²  Ana Paula Pierre de Moraes³  Lilian Maria Sobreira Tanaka⁴ 

[1] Department of Public Health, Federal University of Maranhão;Department of Research, Unimed Rio Hospital;Intensive Care Service, Tarquínio Lopes Filho Hospital;Nutritional Therapy Multidisciplinary Staff, Copa D’Or Hospital;

关键词: Structure;    Process;    Outcome;    Quality;    Assessment;    Intensive care unit;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s13104-017-2563-3

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background There is an increasing need for standardized instruments for quality assessment that are able to reflect the actual conditions of the intensive care practices, especially in low and middle-income countries. The aim of this article is to describe the preparation of an instrument for quality assessment of adult intensive care services adapted to the actual conditions of intensive care in a middle-income country and comprising indicators validated in the literature. Methods The study consisted of five steps: (1) a literature survey; (2) a discussion with specialists by consensus method; (3) a pilot field test; (4) a description of indicators; and (5) an elaboration of the final version of the instrument. Each generated indicator was attributed a score (“out of standard” = 0; “below standard” = 1; “standard” = 2) that allowed calculation of the total score for each service assessed. Results A total of 62 indicators were constructed, distributed as follows: 38 structure indicators (physical structure: 4; human resources: 14; continued education and training: 2; protocols and routines: 12; material resources: 6); 17 process indicators (safety: 7; work: 10); and seven outcome indicators. The maximum possible total score was 124. Conclusions Possible future applications of the instrument for the assessment of intensive care units that was constructed in the present study include benchmarking, multicenter studies, self-assessment of intensive care units, and evaluation of changes resulting from interventions.

【 授权许可】

Unknown