Beyond the diffusion standard model in fixed rat spinal cord with combined linear and planar encoding

NeuroImage

Leif Østergaard¹  Jonas L. Olesen²  Noam Shemesh²  Sune N. Jespersen³ 

[1] Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark;Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN) and MINDLab, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark;Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal;

关键词: Diffusion MRI;    Spinal Cord;    White matter;    Microstructure;    Multi-fascicle models;    Model selection;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Information about tissue on the microscopic and mesoscopic scales can be accessed by modelling diffusion MRI signals, with the aim of extracting microstructure-specific biomarkers. The standard model (SM) of diffusion, currently the most broadly adopted microstructural model, describes diffusion in white matter (WM) tissues by two Gaussian components, one of which has zero radial diffusivity, to represent diffusion in intra- and extra-axonal water, respectively. Here, we reappraise these SM assumptions by collecting comprehensive double diffusion encoded (DDE) MRI data with both linear and planar encodings, which was recently shown to substantially enhance the ability to estimate SM parameters. We find however, that the SM is unable to account for data recorded in fixed rat spinal cord at an ultrahigh field of 16.4 T, suggesting that its underlying assumptions are violated in our experimental data. We offer three model extensions to mitigate this problem: first, we generalize the SM to accommodate finite radii (axons) by releasing the constraint of zero radial diffusivity in the intra-axonal compartment. Second, we include intracompartmental kurtosis to account for non-Gaussian behaviour. Third, we introduce an additional (third) compartment. The ability of these models to account for our experimental data are compared based on parameter feasibility and Bayesian information criterion. Our analysis identifies the three-compartment description as the optimal model. The third compartment exhibits slow diffusion with a minor but non-negligible signal fraction (∼12%). We demonstrate how failure to take the presence of such a compartment into account severely misguides inferences about WM microstructure. Our findings bear significance for microstructural modelling at large and can impact the interpretation of biomarkers extracted from the standard model of diffusion.

【 授权许可】

Unknown