Transforming Development and Disaster Risk

Sustainability

Darin Wahl¹  Jonathan Ensor²  Guoyi Han²  Heidi Tuhkanen²  Åsa Gerger Swartling³  Michael Boyland⁴  Frank Thomalla⁴  Karlee Johnson⁴  John Forrester⁵ 

[1] College of Urban and Public Affairs: Nohad A. Toulon School of Urban Studies and Planning, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201, USA;International Centre of Excellence on Transforming Development and Disaster Risk, Stockholm Environment Institute and Integrated Research on Disaster Risk (IRDR) Programme, Bangkok 10330, Thailand;Stockholm Environment Institute, 10451 Stockholm, Sweden;Stockholm Environment Institute, Bangkok 10330, Thailand;Stockholm Environment Institute, Environment Department, University of York, York YO10 5NG, UK;

关键词: transformation;    sustainable development;    disaster risk;    trade-offs;    equitable resilience;    adaptive governance;   

DOI  :  10.3390/su10051458

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

This article focuses on the complex relationship between development and disaster risk. Development and disaster risk are closely linked as the people and assets exposed to risk, as well as their vulnerability and capacity, are largely determined by development processes. Transformation is key to moving from current development patterns that increase, create or unfairly distribute risks, to forms of development that are equitable, resilient and sustainable. Based on a review of existing literature, we present three opportunities that have the potential to lead to transformation in the development-disaster risk relationship: (i) exposing development-disaster risk trade-offs in development policy and decision-making; (ii) prioritizing equity and social justice in approaches to secure resilience; and (iii) enabling transformation through adaptive governance. This research aims to contribute to breaking down existing barriers in research, policy and practice between the disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, and development communities by providing cross-sectoral opportunities to operationalize theoretical knowledge on transformation. It also helps to clarify the connections between different global agendas by positioning transformation as a potential bridging concept to link disconnected policy processes. This paper argues for empirical research to test the opportunities presented here and further define transformative pathways at multiple scales.

【 授权许可】

Unknown