Chair based exercise in community settings: a cluster randomised feasibility study

BMC Geriatrics

R. Pulikottill-Jacob¹  A. L. Long²  A. L. Gordon²  P. Logan³  K. R. Robinson³  K. A. Anthony³  J. R. F. Gladman³  P. E. Blackshaw⁴  T. Masud⁵  R. H. Harwood⁵  P. Leighton⁶  S. Armstrong⁶ 

[1] Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick;Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham;Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing. Medical School, University of Nottingham;Medical Physics, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust;Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (BRC): Musculoskeletal Disease (MSK) theme;School of Medicine, University of Nottingham;

关键词: Older people;    Exercise;    Care homes;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12877-018-0769-4

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Some older people who find standard exercise programmes too strenuous may be encouraged to exercise while remaining seated - chair based exercises (CBE). We previously developed a consensus CBE programme (CCBE) following a modified Delphi process. We firstly needed to test the feasibility and acceptability of this treatment approach and explore how best to evaluate it before undertaking a definitive trial. Methods A feasibility study with a cluster randomised controlled trial component was undertaken to 1. Examine the acceptability, feasibility and tolerability of the intervention and 2. Assess the feasibility of running a trial across 12 community settings (4 day centres, 4 care homes, 4 community groups). Centres were randomised to either CCBE, group reminiscence or usual care. Outcomes were collected to assess the feasibility of the trial parameters: level of recruitment interest and eligibility, randomisation, adverse events, retention, completion of health outcomes, missing data and delivery of the CCBE. Semi- structured interviews were conducted with participants and care staff following the intervention to explore acceptability. Results 48% (89 out of 184 contacted) of eligible centres were interested in participating with 12 recruited purposively. 73% (94) of the 128 older people screened consented to take part with 83 older people then randomised following mobility testing. Recruitment required greater staffing levels and resources due to 49% of participants requiring a consultee declaration. There was a high dropout rate (40%) primarily due to participants no longer attending the centres. The CCBE intervention was delivered once a week in day centres and community groups and twice a week in care homes. Older people and care staff found the CCBE intervention largely acceptable. Conclusion There was a good level of interest from centres and older people and the CCBE intervention was largely welcomed. The trial design and governance procedures would need to be revised to maximise recruitment and retention. If the motivation for a future trial is physical health then this study has identified that further work to develop the CCBE delivery model is warranted to ensure it can be delivered at a frequency to elicit physiological change. If the motivation for a future trial is psychological outcomes then this study has identified that the current delivery model is feasible. Trial registration ISRCTN27271501. Date registered: 30/01/2018.

【 授权许可】

Unknown