期刊论文详细信息
BMC Public Health
Pilot study of a two-arm non-randomized controlled cluster trial of a psychosocial intervention to improve late life depression in socioeconomically deprived areas of São Paulo, Brazil (PROACTIVE): feasibility study of a psychosocial intervention for late life depression in São Paulo
Ricardo Araya1  Paula Carvalho Pereda2  Renato M. Franzin3  Antônio Carlos Seabra3  Alicia Matijasevich4  Pepijn van de Ven5  Tim J. Peters6  William Hollingworth6  Maria Clara P. de Paula Couto7  Maiara Garcia Henrique7  Marcia Scazufca7  Ana Vilela Mendes7 
[1] Centre of Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neurosciences,King’s College;Departamento de Economia, Universidade de São Paulo;Departamento de Engenharia de Sistemas Eletrônicos, Universidade de São Paulo;Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina (FMUSP), Universidade de São Paulo;Department of Electronics & Computer Engineering, University of Limerick;Department of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol;LIM-23, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Psiquiatria, Hospital das Clínicas (HCFMUSP), Universidade de São Paulo;
关键词: Older adults;    Depression;    Pilot study;    Primary care;    Collaborative care;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12889-019-7495-5
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Depression is a common and recurrent condition among older adults and is associated with poor quality of life and increased health care utilization and costs. The purpose of this pilot study was to assess the feasibility of delivering a psychosocial intervention targeting depression, and to develop the procedures to conduct a cluster randomized controlled trial among older adults registered with primary care clinics in poor neighbourhoods of São Paulo, Brazil. Methods We conducted a pilot study of a two-arm cluster, non-randomized controlled trial. Two primary care clinics adhering to the Family Health Strategy were allocated to either the intervention or the control arm. In the control arm, patients received enhanced usual care consisting of staff training for improved recognition and management of depression. In the intervention arm, alongside the enhanced usual care, patients received a 17-week psychosocial intervention delivered by health workers assisted with an application installed in a tablet. Results We randomly selected 579 of 2020 older adults registered in the intervention clinic to participate in the study. Among these individuals, 353 were assessed for depression and 40 (11.0%) scored at least 10 on the PHQ-9 and were therefore invited to participate. The consent rate was 33/40 (82%) with a resulting yield of 33/579 (5.7%). In the control arm, we randomly selected 320 older adults among 1482 registered in the clinic, 223 were assessed for depression and 28 (12.6%) scored 10 or above on the PHQ-9. The consent rate was 25/28 (89%), with a resulting yield of 25/320 (7.8%). Of the 33 who consented in the intervention arm, 19 (59.4%) completed all sessions. The mean PHQ-9 at follow-up (approximately 30 weeks after inclusion) were 12.3 (SD = 3.7) and 3.8 (SD = 3.9) in the control and intervention arms, respectively. Follow-up rates were 92 and 94% in control and intervention arms, respectively. Conclusions Identification and engagement of clinics, randomization, recruitment of individuals, measures, and baseline and follow-up assessments all proved to be feasible in primary care clinics in São Paulo, Brazil. Results support the development of a definitive cluster randomized controlled trial. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered with Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos (ReBEC), number RBR-5nf6wd. Registered 06 August 2018.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次