Notre-Dame de Paris. “Dov’era e com’era”: the replica that inhabits in the ruin

Loggia, Arquitectura & Restauración

Miguel Ángel Ortín Molina¹  Sergio Ortín Molina² 

[1] ;Universitat Politècnica de València;

关键词: reconstrucción;    patrimonio;    siglo xx;    controversia;    notre-dame de parís;   

DOI  :  10.4995/loggia.2021.15209

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The future intervention on the Cathedral of Notre-Dame in Paris has generated a debate that, despite appearing to be modern, remains open in an irresolvable way for decades in the field of architectural heritage restoration. The reconstruction of the St. Mark’s “Campanile” after its collapse, the recovery of the great European monuments damaged during the wars of the 20th century, such as the Cathedral of Reims, the Abbey of Montecassino or the “Frauenkirche”, and the identical restitution of symbolic buildings such as the “Gran Teatre del Liceu” in Barcelona or “La Fenice” in Venice, are just some of the cases that have followed the principles of ‘historical restoration’. The recent event of Notre-Dame opens a new window to contemporary thoughts on what could be the most appropriate way to intervene on Cultural Heritage, testing the validity of the widespread philosophy of “dov’era e com’era”.

【 授权许可】

Unknown