Modeling stage–discharge–sediment using support vector machine and artificial neural network coupled with wavelet transform

Applied Water Science

Ahmed Elbeltagi¹  Alban Kuriqi²  Pravendra Kumar³  Manish Kumar³  Anil Kumar³ 

[1] Agricultural Engineering Dept., Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University;CERIS, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa;Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, College of Technology, G.B.P.U.A.&T.;

关键词: Stage–discharge–sediment modeling;    Gamma test;    ANN;    SVM;    Wavelet;    Adityapur;   

DOI  :  10.1007/s13201-022-01621-7

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Many real water issues involve rivers’ sediment load or the load that rivers can bring without degrading the fluvial ecosystem. Therefore, the assessment of sediments carried by a river is also crucial in the planning and designing of various water resource projects. In the current study, five different data-driven techniques, namely artificial neural network (ANN), wavelet-based artificial neural network (WANN), support vector machine (SVM), wavelet-based support vector machine (WSVM), and multiple-linear regression (MLR) techniques, were employed for time-series modeling of daily suspended sediment concentration (SSC). Hydrological datasets containing the daily stage (h), discharge (Q), and SSC for 10 years (2004–2013) from June to October at Adityapur and Ghatshila station of Subernrekha river basin, Jharkhand, India, were considered for analysis. The Gamma test was used to determine the input variables in the first step. Various combinations were made by lagging the maximum three-day time step for predicting current-day SSC. The outcomes of ANN, SVM, WAAN, WSVM, and MLR models were evaluated with the actual values of SSC based on statistical metrics. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), root-mean-square error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and Wilmot index (WI) as well as visual inspection of time variation, scatter plots, and Taylor diagrams. Our results stated that the WSVM model discovered the best trustworthy models among all existing models. PCC, RMSE, NSE, and WI values were 0.844 and 0.781, 0.096 g/l and 0.057 g/l, 0.711 and 0.591, 0.907 and 0.878, respectively, throughout the training and testing processes at the Adityapur site. Also, at the Ghatshila location, it was the most accurate model. During the training and testing stages, PCC, RMSE, NSE, and WI values were 0.928 and 0.751, 0.117 g/l and 0.095 g/l, 0.861 and 0.541, 0.962 and 0.859, respectively. Our findings showed that the WANN model was the second-best model during the testing phase for both sites. Hence, the WSVM technique can model SSC at this location and other similar (i.e., geomorphology and flow regime type) rivers.

【 授权许可】

Unknown