期刊论文详细信息
HBRC Journal
Simulating USBR4908 by ANN
G. Salama1  O.A. Hodhod2 
[1] Eng., Civil Eng. Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt;Properties and Strength of Materials, Struct. Eng. Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt;
关键词: Sulfate attack;    Cement type;    Fly ash;    Silica fume;    USBR4908 test method;    Artificial neural networks (ANNs);   
DOI  :  10.1016/j.hbrcj.2013.05.004
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

One of the available tests that can be used to evaluate the sulfate resistance of concrete is a procedure for length change of hardened concrete exposed to alkali sulfates (USBR4908). However, there are deficiencies in this test method including a lengthy measuring period, insensitivity of the measurement tool to the progression of sulfate attack. Moreover it is difficult to obtain experimental expansion due to time and cost limitations. A reasonable prediction for the expansion in USBR4908 is basically required. This study focuses on the artificial neural network (ANN) as an alternative approach to evaluate the sulfate resistance of concrete. A total of 273 different data for three types of Portland cement combined with fly ash (FA) or silica fume (SF) concrete mixes, along with different w/c ratios of 0.35, 0.45 and 0.55 were collected from the experimental program. ANN models were developed. The data used in the ANN model consisted of five input parameters which include W/B ratio, cement content(CC), FA or SF content, tricalcium aluminate content (C3A), and exposure duration (D). Output parameter is determined as expansion (E). Back propagation (BP) algorithm was employed for the ANN training in which a Tansig function was used as the nonlinear transfer function. Through the comparison of the estimated results from the ANN models and experimental data, it was clear that the ANN models give high prediction accuracy. In addition, the research results demonstrate that using ANN models to predict the expansion in concrete cylinders is practical and beneficial.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:3次