Two-Phase Evaluation of the Validity of a Measure for Self-Regulated Learning in Sport Practice

Frontiers in Psychology

Bradley W. Young¹  Joseph Baker²  Lindsay McCardle² 

[1] School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada;School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada;

关键词: self-regulation;    deliberate practice;    expert development;    metacognition;    motivation;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02641

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Given the potential role of self-regulated learning (SRL) for enhancing practice and expertise development, we aimed to advance a valid and reliable athlete self-report measure of SRL for sport practice. We built on Toering et al. (2012a) initial SRL instrument along with Bartulovic et al. (2017) sport-specific modifications, and created new items to extend the conceptual breadth of the subscales. With a multi-sport sample of 482 athletes (Mage = 26.45, SD = 12.66; 55% female), two analytic phases tested (1) the factorial validity of the initial and the extended inventories, and (2) criterion validity, by examining how SRL scores distinguished skill groups ranging from local to international competitive levels. In Phase 1, the initial measurement model demonstrated psychometric concerns and we opted to pursue a refined model. The extended model demonstrated acceptable factorial validity but resulted in the fewest subscales. In Phase 2, subscales scores from all three models generally distinguished international-level senior (18 + years) athletes from lesser-skilled groups. Integrating the psychometric evidence and between-group effects across the initial, refined, and extended models, we conclude that the refined inventory, the Self-Regulated Learning for Sport Practice (SRL-SP) survey, is the preferred instrument.

【 授权许可】

Unknown