期刊论文详细信息
Journal of Functional Biomaterials
Computational Contact Pressure Prediction of CoCrMo, SS 316L and Ti6Al4V Femoral Head against UHMWPE Acetabular Cup under Gait Cycle
J. Jamari1  Gatot Santoso2  S. Sugiharto2  Toto Supriyono2  Akbar Teguh Prakoso3  Hasan Basri3  Emile van der Heide4  Muhammad Imam Ammarullah5 
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia;Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pasundan University, Bandung 40264, West Java, Indonesia;Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Sriwijaya University, Indralaya 30662, South Sumatra, Indonesia;Laboratory for Surface Technology and Tribology, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands;Undip Biomechanics Engineering & Research Centre (UBM-ERC), Diponegoro University, Semarang 50275, Central Java, Indonesia;
关键词: CoCrMo;    contact pressure;    SS 316L;    Ti6Al4V;    total hip arthroplasty;    UHMWPE;   
DOI  :  10.3390/jfb13020064
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Due to various concerns about the use of metal-on-metal that is detrimental to users, the use of metal as acetabular cup material was later changed to ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). However, the wear on UHMWPE releases polyethylene wear particles, which can trigger a negative body response and contribute to osteolysis. For reducing the wear of polyethylene, one of the efforts is to investigate the selection of metal materials. Cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo), stainless steel 316L (SS 316L), and titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) are the frequently employed materials. The computational evaluation of contact pressure was carried out using a two-dimensional axisymmetric model for UHMWPE acetabular cup paired with metal femoral head under gait cycle in this study. The results show Ti6Al4V-on-UHMWPE is able to reduce cumulative contact pressure compared to SS 316L-on-UHMWPE and CoCrMo-on-UHMWPE. Compared to Ti6Al4V-on-UHMWPE at peak loading, the difference in cumulative contact pressure to respective maximum contact pressure is 9.740% for SS 316L-on-UHMWPE and 11.038% for CoCrMo-on-UHMWPE.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:0次