Adverse events in psychiatry: a national cohort study in Sweden with a unique psychiatric trigger tool

BMC Psychiatry

Madeleine Borgstedt-Risberg¹  Lena Nilsson²  Charlotta Brunner³  Urban Nylén⁴  Ullakarin Nyberg⁵  Hans Rutberg⁶  Carina Ålenius⁶ 

[1] Centre for Organisational Support and Development (CVU), Region Östergötland, Linköping University;Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University;Department of Psychiatry, Kalmar County Council;National Board of Health and Welfare;Stockholm Centre for Psychiatric Research and Education, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet;Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions;

关键词: Adverse event;    Patient harm;    Patient safety;    Trigger tool;    Psychiatry;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12888-020-2447-2

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background The vast majority of patient safety research has focused on somatic health care. Although specific adverse events (AEs) within psychiatric healthcare have been explored, the overall level and nature of AEs is sparsely investigated. Methods Cohort study using a retrospective record review based on a two-step trigger tool methodology in the charts of randomly selected patients 18 years or older admitted to the psychiatric acute care departments in all Swedish regions from January 1 to June 30, 2017. Hospital care together with corresponding outpatient care were reviewed as a continuum, over a maximum of 3 months. The AEs were categorised according to type, severity and preventability. Results In total, the medical records of 2552 patients were reviewed. Among the patients, 50.4% were women and 49.6% were men. The median (range) age was 44 (18–97) years for women and 44.5 (18–93) years for men. In 438 of the reviewed records, 720 AEs were identified, corresponding to the AEs identified in 17.2% [95% confidence interval, 15.7–18.6] of the records. The majority of AEs resulted in less or moderate harm, and 46.2% were considered preventable. Prolonged disease progression and deliberate self-harm were the most common types of AEs. AEs were significantly more common in women (21.5%) than in men (12.7%) but showed no difference between age groups. Severe or catastrophic harm was found in 2.3% of the records, and the majority affected were women (61%). Triggers pointing at deficient quality of care were found in 78% of the records, with the absence of a treatment plan being the most common. Conclusions AEs are common in psychiatric care. Aside from further patient safety work, systematic interventions are also warranted to improve the quality of psychiatric care.

【 授权许可】

Unknown