Passive Animal Surveillance to Identify Ticks in Wisconsin, 2011–2017

Insects

SusanM. Paskewitz¹  Xia Lee¹  Diep Hoang Johnson²  DarbyS. Murphy³ 

[1] Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA;Infection Control, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, WI 53715, USA;MPH program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA;

关键词: Ixodidae;    hard ticks;    host record;    county record;   

DOI  :  10.3390/insects10090289

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The introduction of new tick species poses a risk to human and animal health. Systematic active surveillance programs are expensive and uncommon. We evaluated a passive animal surveillance program as a monitoring tool to document the geographic distribution and host associations of ticks in Wisconsin. Passive surveillance partners included veterinary medical clinics, domestic animal shelters, and wildlife rehabilitation centers from 35 of the 72 Wisconsin counties. A total of 10,136 tick specimens were collected from 2325 animals from July 2011 to November 2017 and included Dermacentor variabilis Say (29.7% of all ticks), Ixodes texanus Banks (25.5%), Ixodes scapularis Say (19.5%), Haemaphysalis leporispalustris Packard (13.8%), Ixodes cookei Packard (4.4%), and Dermacentor albipictus Packard (1.7%). Less common species (<1% of collection) included Ixodes dentatus Marx, Ixodes sculptus Neumann, Ixodes marxi Banks, Amblyomma americanum Linnaeus, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus Latreille. Of the 2325 animals that were examined, most were domestic dogs (53%), eastern cottontail rabbits (16%), domestic cats (15%), and North American raccoons (11%). An additional 21 mammal and 11 bird species were examined at least once during the six years of the study. New county records are summarized for each species. Public health, academic, and veterinary and animal care partners formed a community of practice enabling effective statewide tick surveillance.

【 授权许可】

Unknown