期刊论文详细信息
BMC Cancer
Health-related quality of life in patients receiving first-line eribulin mesylate with or without trastuzumab for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
Joyce O’Shaughnessy1  Yaohua He2  Erhan Berrak2  Kristi McIntyre3  Sharon Wilks4  Shannon Puhalla5  Linda Vahdat6  Lee Schwartzberg7 
[1] Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology;Eisai Inc. (former employees);Texas Oncology-Dallas Presbyterian Hospital, US Oncology;US Oncology-Cancer Care Centers of South Texas;University of Pittsburgh Medical Center;Weill Cornell Medical College;West Cancer Center;
关键词: Eribulin;    First-line therapy;    Health-related quality of life;    Metastatic breast cancer;    Trastuzumab;   
DOI  :  10.1186/s12885-019-5674-5
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background Eribulin mesylate is a nontaxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor approved for second-line (European Union) or third-line (United States) treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Two phase 2 single trials, evaluating first-line eribulin as monotherapy (Study 206; NCT01268150) or in combination with trastuzumab (Study 208; NCT01269346) in locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, demonstrated objective response rates of 28.6 and 71.2%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 6.8 and 11.6 months, respectively. Tolerability profiles were similar to those from previous studies. This secondary analysis was conducted to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in both phase 2 trials. Methods Patients received eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. Patients in Study 208 also received intravenous trastuzumab on day 1 of each cycle (8 mg/kg in cycle 1, then 6 mg/kg). HRQoL was assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life (QLQ-C30) assessment tool and the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for Breast Cancer (QLQ-BR23) at baseline and cycles 2, 4, and 6. Results for clinically meaningful changes were based on previously published minimum important differences. Results Of the 108 patients (56 in Study 206 and 52 in Study 208) treated, 57 and 87%, respectively, completed 6 cycles. Completion rates for both questionnaires were 94 and 98%, respectively, at cycle 6. Most patients had stable/improved HRQoL scores with some exceptions; for example, more patients experienced a worsening in cognitive functioning and systemic therapy side effects than experienced improvement. Mean QLQ-C30 symptom scores correlated with corresponding adverse event rates for nausea/vomiting, dyspnea, appetite loss, constipation, and diarrhea in Study 206 and for fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea in Study 208. Conclusions First-line eribulin ± trastuzumab therapy did not lead to deterioration of overall HRQoL in most patients, with more than 60% of patients having stable/improved global health status/quality-of-life scores. Eribulin has been demonstrated to be comparable with other chemotherapy agents with an acceptable safety profile. Therefore, further evaluation is warranted to determine whether eribulin ± trastuzumab therapy may be a potential option for first-line treatment in some patients with metastatic breast cancer who were recently treated in the neoadjuvant setting. Trial registration NCT01268150 (December 29, 2010), NCT01269346 (January 4, 2011)

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:1次