| New Microbes and New Infections | |
| Are two consecutive negative RT-PCR results enough to rule out COVID-19? | |
| G. Saliba1  E. Haddad2  S. Mortada2  R. Waked2  J. Makhoul2  N. Chehata2  A. Zoghbi3  J. Choucair4  | |
| [1] Corresponding author: J. Makhoul, Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon.;Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon;Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon;Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Saint Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon; | |
| 关键词: Coronavirus; COVID-19; pneumonia; polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV-2; | |
| DOI : | |
| 来源: DOAJ | |
【 摘 要 】
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is redefining the world we live in, and scientists are struggling to find the best severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnostic tool. Routine testing is currently performed using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) of upper or lower respiratory tract secretions. We sought to demonstrate the importance of conducting RT-PCR using deep sampling when initial upper respiratory testing is negative in cases of high index of suspicion for COVID-19. We present the case of a 47-year-old man admitted for fever and bilateral pneumonia diagnosed via chest computed tomographic scan amidst the early peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Two RT-PCR results from nasopharyngeal swab samples were negative. A bronchoscopy was then performed, and RT-PCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage samples yielded positive results, confirming the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia. RT-PCR samples of the lower respiratory tract likely contain a higher virus load and thus retain a higher sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
【 授权许可】
Unknown