Evaluation of large-group lectures in medicine – development of the SETMED-L (Student Evaluation of Teaching in MEDical Lectures) questionnaire

BMC Medical Education

Katharina Dreiling¹  Tobias Raupach¹  Tjark Müller²  Sven Anders²  Sarah Schiekirka-Schwake³  Diego Montano⁴  Nicole von Steinbüchel⁴  Herbert Poinstingl⁴ 

[1]Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Medical Centre Göttingen

[2]Department of Legal Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf

[3]Division of Medical Education Research and Curriculum Development, Göttingen University Medical Centre

[4]Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Georg-August-University Göttingen

关键词: Evaluation;    Lecture;    Medical education;    Psychometrics;    Questionnaire;    SETMED-L;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s12909-017-0970-8

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Background The seven categories of the Stanford Faculty Development Program (SFDP) represent a framework for planning and assessing medical teaching. Nevertheless, so far there is no specific evaluation tool for large-group lectures that is based on these categories. This paper reports the development and psychometric validation of a short German evaluation tool for large-group lectures in medical education (SETMED-L: ‘Student Evaluation of Teaching in MEDical Lectures’) based on the SFDP-categories. Methods Data were collected at two German medical schools. In Study 1, a full information factor analysis of the new 14-item questionnaire was performed. In Study 2, following cognitive debriefings and adjustments, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed. The model was tested for invariance across medical schools and student gender. Convergent validity was assessed by comparison with results of the FEVOR questionnaire. Results Study 1 (n = 922) yielded a three-factor solution with one major (10 items) and two minor factors (2 items each). In Study 2 (n = 2740), this factor structure was confirmed. Scale reliability ranged between α = 0.71 and α = 0.88. Measurement invariance was given across student gender but not across medical schools. Convergent validity in the subsample tested (n = 246) yielded acceptable results. Conclusion The SETMED-L showed satisfactory to very good psychometric characteristics. The main advantages are its short yet comprehensive form, the integration of SFDP-categories and its focus on medical education.

【 授权许可】

Unknown