Re-establishing What Went Wrong Before: The Greenspan Put as Macroeconomic Modellers’ New Normal

Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies

Matthew Watson¹ 

[1] University of Warwick;

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Almost a decade after his retirement Alan Greenspan remains the world’s most immediately recognisable and highest profile central banker. This article reviews Greenspan’s ostensible move away from efficient markets theorising as he has tried to come to terms with the patterns of ‘euphoria’ and ‘fear’ he believes explain the build-up to the global financial crisis. In truth, though, it looks much more like an attempt to rescue the reputation of his free market models in the face of an increasing number of sceptics. Greenspan’s new memoire fails to acknowledge what, in effect, was the free put option the Federal Reserve provided to Wall Street traders under his leadership. Indeed, it goes as far as to promote a visualisation technique for how macroeconomic modellers should view the basic structure of the market environment which treats the now increasingly infamous ‘Greenspan put’ as an ostensibly formal component of asset prices. The style of policymaking that helped to stoke such extreme asset price inflation prior to the crisis is now embedded:(i) within the class of models that Greenspan has presented as the post-crisis antidote to efficient markets theorising; and (ii) within the recent historical data being used in the calibration tests of the models’ efficacy. What macroeconomic modellers can see in the market environment when embracing the supposedly new reality of euphoria and fear is a manifestation of what the prior existence of the Greenspan put first brought into view

【 授权许可】

Unknown