Addition of 24‐Hour Heart Rate Variability Parameters to the Cardiovascular Health Study Stroke Risk Score and Prediction of Incident Stroke: The Cardiovascular Health Study

Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease

Willem J. Kop¹  Jorge R. Kizer²  Hooman Kamel³  Phyllis K. Stein⁴  Rohan K. Bodapati⁴ 

[1]Department of Medical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Center for Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands

[2]Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY

[3]Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

[4]Heart Rate Variability Laboratory, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

关键词: autonomic nervous system;    clinical stroke risk model;    heart rate variability;    prediction;    predictors;    risk prediction;   

DOI  :  10.1161/JAHA.116.004305

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

BackgroundHeart rate variability (HRV) characterizes cardiac autonomic functioning. The association of HRV with stroke is uncertain. We examined whether 24‐hour HRV added predictive value to the Cardiovascular Health Study clinical stroke risk score (CHS‐SCORE), previously developed at the baseline examination. Methods and ResultsN=884 stroke‐free CHS participants (age 75.3±4.6), with 24‐hour Holters adequate for HRV analysis at the 1994–1995 examination, had 68 strokes over ≤8 year follow‐up (median 7.3 [interquartile range 7.1–7.6] years). The value of adding HRV to the CHS‐SCORE was assessed with stepwise Cox regression analysis. The CHS‐SCORE predicted incident stroke (HR=1.06 per unit increment, P=0.005). Two HRV parameters, decreased coefficient of variance of NN intervals (CV%, P=0.031) and decreased power law slope (SLOPE, P=0.033) also entered the model, but these did not significantly improve the c‐statistic (P=0.47). In a secondary analysis, dichotomization of CV% (LOWCV% ≤12.8%) was found to maximally stratify higher‐risk participants after adjustment for CHS‐SCORE. Similarly, dichotomizing SLOPE (LOWSLOPE <−1.4) maximally stratified higher‐risk participants. When these HRV categories were combined (eg, HIGHCV% with HIGHSLOPE), the c‐statistic for the model with the CHS‐SCORE and combined HRV categories was 0.68, significantly higher than 0.61 for the CHS‐SCORE alone (P=0.02). ConclusionsIn this sample of older adults, 2 HRV parameters, CV% and power law slope, emerged as significantly associated with incident stroke when added to a validated clinical risk score. After each parameter was dichotomized based on its optimal cut point in this sample, their composite significantly improved prediction of incident stroke during ≤8‐year follow‐up. These findings will require validation in separate, larger cohorts.

【 授权许可】

Unknown