Potential Pitfalls of Using Fractional Anisotropy, Axial Diffusivity, and Radial Diffusivity as Biomarkers of Cerebral White Matter Microstructure

Frontiers in Neuroscience

Chase R. Figley³  Josep Puig⁴  Md Nasir Uddin⁴  Kaihim Wong⁴  Teresa D. Figley⁵  Jennifer Kornelsen⁷ 

[1] Pathophysiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada;Department of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States;;Department of Physiology &Department of Radiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada;Division of Diagnostic Imaging, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Canada;Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain;Neuroscience Research Program, Kleysen Institute for Advanced Medicine, Winnipeg, MB, Canada;

关键词: axial diffusivity;    crossing fibers;    diffusion MRI;    fractional anisotropy;    radial diffusivity;    white matter;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fnins.2021.799576

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Fractional anisotropy (FA), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) are commonly used as MRI biomarkers of white matter microstructure in diffusion MRI studies of neurodevelopment, brain aging, and neurologic injury/disease. Some of the more frequent practices include performing voxel-wise or region-based analyses of these measures to cross-sectionally compare individuals or groups, longitudinally assess individuals or groups, and/or correlate with demographic, behavioral or clinical variables. However, it is now widely recognized that the majority of cerebral white matter voxels contain multiple fiber populations with different trajectories, which renders these metrics highly sensitive to the relative volume fractions of the various fiber populations, the microstructural integrity of each constituent fiber population, and the interaction between these factors. Many diffusion imaging experts are aware of these limitations and now generally avoid using FA, AD or RD (at least in isolation) to draw strong reverse inferences about white matter microstructure, but based on the continued application and interpretation of these metrics in the broader biomedical/neuroscience literature, it appears that this has perhaps not yet become common knowledge among diffusion imaging end-users. Therefore, this paper will briefly discuss the complex biophysical underpinnings of these measures in the context of crossing fibers, provide some intuitive “thought experiments” to highlight how conventional interpretations can lead to incorrect conclusions, and suggest that future studies refrain from using (over-interpreting) FA, AD, and RD values as standalone biomarkers of cerebral white matter microstructure.

【 授权许可】

Unknown