Substitution between Immigrant and Native Farmworkers in the United States: Does Legal Status Matter?

IZA Journal of Development and Migration

Roka Fritz¹  Önel Gülcan²  Guan Zhengfei³  Wei Xuan⁴ 

[1] Florida Gulf Coast University, FloridaUnited States;Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, FloridaUnited States;Gulf Coast Research & Education Center, University of Florida, FloridaUnited States;Mid-Florida Research & Education Center, University of Florida, FloridaUnited States;

关键词: elasticity of substitution;    immigration;    legal status;    agricultural labor;    nested ces framework;    j20;    j43;    j61;   

DOI  :  10.2478/izajodm-2019-0007

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

The policy debate surrounding the employment of immigrant workers in U.S. agriculture centers around the extent to which immigrant farmworkers adversely affect the economic opportunities of native farmworkers. To help answer this question, we propose a three-layer nested constant elasticity of substitution (CES) framework to investigate the substitutability among heterogeneous farmworker groups based on age, skill, and legal status utilizing National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) data from 1989 through 2012. We use farmwork experience and type of task performed as alternative proxies for skill to disentangle the substitution effect between U.S. citizens, authorized immigrants, and unauthorized immigrant farmworkers. Results show that substitutability between the three legal status groups is small; neither authorized nor unauthorized immigrant farmworkers have a significant impact on the employment of native farmworkers.

【 授权许可】

Unknown