Age-Related Differences in Contribution of Rule-Based Thinking toward Moral Evaluations

Frontiers in Psychology

Alessandro Antonietti¹  Vera Pagani¹  Lindamulage N. De Silva¹  Simona C. S. Caravita²  Barbara Colombo³ 

[1] Department of Psychology, Center for Research on Vocational Guidance and Socio-Professional Development, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy;Department of Psychology, Centro di Ricerca sulle Dinamiche Evolutive ed Educative (CRIdee), Università Cattolicà del Sacro CuoreMilan, Italy;Education and Human Studies, Champlain CollegeBurlington, VT, USA;

关键词: moral development;    moral reasoning;    decision making;    social cognition;    middle childhood;    adolescence;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00597

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

This study aims to investigate the interplay of different criteria of moral evaluation, related to the type of the rule and context characteristics, in moral reasoning of children, early, and late adolescents. Students attending to fourth, seventh, and tenth grade were asked to evaluate the acceptability of rule breaking actions using ad hoc scenarios. Results suggest that the role of different moral evaluation criteria changes by age. During adolescence a greater integration of the moral criteria emerged. Moreover, adolescents also prioritized the evaluation of moral rule (forbidding to harm others) violations as non-acceptable when the perpetrator harms an innocent victim by applying a direct personal force. The relevance of these findings to increase the understanding of how moral reasoning changes by age for the assessment of impairments in moral reasoning of non-normative groups is also discussed.

【 授权许可】

Unknown