Under Pressure to Achieve? The Impact of Type and Style of Task Instructions on Student Cheating

Frontiers in Psychology

Maarten Vansteenkiste¹  Aikaterina Michou²  Caroline Julia Pulfrey³ 

[1] Department of Developmental, Personal and Social Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium;Graduate School of Education, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey;Laboratory of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland;

关键词: achievement goal complex;    cheating;    mastery-approach goals;    autonomy-support;    self-enhancement values;   

DOI  :  10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01624

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Combining principles of Achievement Goal Theory, which maintains that performance goals play a key role in individuals’ likelihood of cheating, and Self-Determination Theory, which highlights the importance of autonomy support and autonomous motivation underlying achievement goals, we examined whether the combination of experimentally inducing a mastery-approach (relative to performance-approach) goal with an autonomy-supportive manner (instead of controlling) may attenuate cheating. In two experiments carried out with university students, one classroom based (N = 164) and one laboratory (N = 160), we manipulated the type of induced goal (performance- vs. mastery-approach) and style of introducing the goal (i.e., controlling vs. autonomy-supportive) by taking also into consideration participants’ values. We hypothesized that the least behaviorally observed cheating would occur in a context promoting mastery-approach goals in an autonomy-supportive way and among individuals low in self-enhancement value adherence. The dependent variables in both studies consisted of two set of exercises, both including questions that could only be solved by cheating. Results of Poisson regression analyses revealed that in both studies the least cheating in the first set of exercises occurred in the autonomy-supportive/mastery-approach condition, indicating that this induced goal complex has the greatest potential to restrain academic dishonesty in the short-term. Interaction effects with self-enhancement value adherence revealed that the cheating inhibitory effects of this induced goal complex was less effective for those who value power and achievement.

【 授权许可】

Unknown