Psychosocial Management Before, During, and After Emergencies and Disasters—Results from the Kobe Expert Meeting

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Sho Takahashi¹  Shiori Usami²  Yoshiharu Kim³  Sonoe Mashino⁴  PhilipJ. Schluter⁵  Mélissa Généreux⁶  Ryoma Kayano⁷ 

[1] Department of Disaster Psychiatry, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Japan;Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto 860-8555, Japan;National Institute of Mental Health, National Center for Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira 187-0031, Japan;Research Institute of Nursing Care for People and Community, University of Hyōgo, Akashi 673-8588, Japan;School of Health Sciences, University of Canterbury—Te Whare Wānanga o Waitaha, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand;Sherbrooke Hospital University Centre, Eastern Townships Integrated University Centre in Health and Social Services, Sherbrooke, QC J1J 3H5, Canada;World Health Organization Centre for Health Development, Kobe 651-0073, Japan;

关键词: health emergency and disaster risk management (Health-EDRM);    Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction;    WHO Thematic Platform for Health-EDRM Research Network;    post-traumatic stress disorder;    mental health impacts;    psychosocial management;    community resilience;   

DOI  :  10.3390/ijerph16081309

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Emergencies and disasters typically affect entire communities, cause substantial losses and disruption, and result in a significant and persistent mental health burden. There is currently a paucity of evidence on safe and effective individual- and community-level strategies for improving mental health before, during, and after such events. In October 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) Centre for Health Development (WHO Kobe Centre) convened a meeting bringing together leading Asia Pacific and international disaster research experts. The expert meeting identified key research needs in five major areas, one being “Psychosocial management before, during, and after emergencies and disasters„. Experts for this research area identified critical gaps in observational research (i.e., the monitoring of long-term psychological consequences) and interventional research (i.e., the development and evaluation of individual- and community-level interventions). Three key research issues were identified. First, experts underscored the need for a standardized and psychometrically robust instrument that classified the mental health/psychosocial risk of people within both a clinical and community setting. Then, the need for a standardization of methods for prevention, screening, diagnosis, and treatment for affected people was highlighted. Finally, experts called for a better identification of before, during, and after emergency or disaster assets associated with greater community resilience.

【 授权许可】

Unknown