Psychophysical and rTMS Evidence for the Presence of Motion Opponency in Human V5

Brain Stimulation

Allan Wu¹  Choi Deblieck²  Marco Iacoboni³  Zili Liu⁴  Benjamin Thompson⁵ 

[1] Corresponding author. Tel.: [phone] x 39398;School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand;fax: [phone].;AcCENT (Academic Center for ECT and Neuromodulation), University Psychiatric Center – KU Leuven (University of Leuven) – Campus Kortenberg, Kortenberg, Belgium;School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Canada;

关键词: Visual cortex;    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation;    Motion perception;    Primary visual cortex;    MT;    Middle temporal area;   

DOI  :  

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Background: Motion sensitive cells within macaque V5, but not V1, exhibit motion opponency whereby their firing is suppressed by motion in their anti-preferred direction. fMRI studies indicate the presence of motion opponent mechanisms in human V5. Objective/hypothesis: We tested two hypotheses. 1) Performance of a motion discrimination task would be poorer when stimuli were constructed from pairs of dots that moved in counter-phase vs. in-phase, because counter-phase dots would activate motion opponent mechanisms in V5. 2) Offline 1 Hz rTMS of V5 would impair discrimination performance for in-phase stimuli but not counter-phase stimuli, and the opposite effect would be found for rTMS of V1. Methods: Stimuli were constructed from 100 dot pairs. Paired dots moved along a fixed motion axis either in counter-phase (motion opponent stimulus) or in-phase (non-opponent motion stimulus). Motion axis orientation discrimination thresholds were measured for each stimulus. Blocks of 300 trials were then presented at 85% correct threshold and discrimination accuracy was measured before and after 1 Hz offline rTMS of either V1 or V5. Subjects were 8 healthy adults. Results: Discrimination thresholds were significantly larger (worse) for counter-phase than in-phase stimuli (p = 0.02). V5 rTMS mildly impaired discrimination accuracy for the in-phase dot stimuli (p = 0.02) but not the counter-phase dot stimuli. The opposite effect occurred for V1 rTMS (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Opponent motion mechanisms are present within human V5 and activation of these mechanisms impairs motion discrimination. In addition, perception of the motion axis within opponent motion stimuli involves processing within V1.

【 授权许可】

Unknown