期刊论文详细信息
Asian Journal of Surgery
Single-incision robotic colectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: A matched case control study
En-Kwang Lin1  Chien-Hsin Chen2  Tung-Cheng Chang3  Yen-Jung Lu4  Ming-Te Huang4 
[1] Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan;Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan;Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Shuang-Ho Hospital, Number 291 Zhongzheng Road, Zhonghe District, Taipei, Taiwan;Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, WanFang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No.111 Sec. 3 Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei, Taiwan;
关键词: Single-incision;    Robotic colectomy;    Laparoscopic colectomy;    Minimal invasive surgery;    Colon cancer;   
DOI  :  
来源: DOAJ
【 摘 要 】

Background: Single incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) and single incision robotic colectomy (SIRC) are both advanced minimally invasive operative techniques. However, studies comparing these two surgical methods have not been published. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the short-term outcomes of SIRC with those of SILC. Methods: A total of 21 consecutive patients underwent SIRC and 136 consecutive patients underwent SILC in separate institutes between January 2013 and December 2019. We used retrospective cohort matching to analyze these patients. Results: Prior to matching, patients who underwent SIRC had a lower percentage of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grades III–IV (5% vs. 19%, P = 0.11) compared with patients who underwent SILC. The SIRC group revealed a higher proportion of sigmoid colon lesions and anterior resections than the SILC group (61% vs. 45%, P = 0.16). After 1:4 cohort matching, 21 patients were enrolled in the SIRC group and 84 patients were enrolled in the SILC group. No statistically significant difference in terms of operative time (SIRC: 185 ± 46 min, SILC: 208 ± 53 min; P = 0.51), estimated blood loss (SIRC: 12 ± 22 ml, SILC: 85 ± 234 ml; P = 0.12), and complications (SIRC: 4.7%, SIRC: 7.1%; P = 0.31) was observed between these groups. Length of postoperative hospital stay (SIRC: 8.3 ± 1.7 days, SILC: 9.3 ± 6.5; P = 0.10) and number of harvested lymph nodes (SIRC: 21.3 ± 10.3, SILC: 21.3 ± 9.5; P = 0.77) were also similar between the two groups. In subgroup analysis, numbers of harvested lymph node is less in SIRC than SILC (SIRC: 18.1 ± 4.7 vs. SILC: 18.9 ± 8.1, P = 0.04) in anterior resection. Conclusion: SIRC and SILC are safe and feasible procedures with similar surgical and pathological outcomes for right- and left-side colectomy.

【 授权许可】

Unknown   

  文献评价指标  
  下载次数:0次 浏览次数:1次