The case for increased centralization in integration governance: the neglected perspective

Comparative Migration Studies

Vilde Hernes¹ 

[1] Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research, Oslo Metropolitan University;

关键词: Central–local governance;    Integration governance;    Immigrant integration;    Local autonomy;   

DOI  :  10.1186/s40878-021-00247-z

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Local autonomy is a highly promoted feature in European governance, and the integration field is no exception. In the integration literature, values and considerations favoring local autonomy are often emphasized, while values and considerations underpinning central steering has received less analytical attention, thus a more nuanced perspective in studies of central–local governance relations is warranted. This commentary identifies general dilemmas in central–local governance which expose clear justifications for both local autonomy and central steering. Furthermore, it presents empirical examples of policy changes regulating central–local governance in the Scandinavian countries where increased centralization has been introduced with reference to promoting values and considerations favoring central steering, such as a fairer distribution of responsibilities between local authorities, legal safeguards for individuals, and equal service provision across the country. Lastly, it suggests how future studies of central–local governance could benefit from of taking a more nuanced perspective.

【 授权许可】

Unknown