A behavior‐based framework for assessing barrier effects to wildlife from vehicle traffic volume

Ecosphere

Leslie L. Bliss‐Ketchum¹  Catherine E. deRivera¹  Winston P. Smith²  Sandra L. Jacobson³ 

[1] Department of Environmental Science & Management School of the Environment Portland State University Portland Oregon 97207‐0751 USA;USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station La Grande Oregon 97850 USA;USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station Davis California 95618 USA;

关键词: antipredator behavior;    barrier effect;    habitat connectivity;    highways;    risk‐disturbance;    roadkill;   

DOI  :  10.1002/ecs2.1345

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Abstract Roads, while central to the function of human society, create barriers to animal movement through collisions and habitat fragmentation. Barriers to animal movement affect the evolution and trajectory of populations. Investigators have attempted to use traffic volume, the number of vehicles passing a point on a road segment, to predict effects to wildlife populations approximately linearly and along taxonomic lines; however, taxonomic groupings cannot provide sound predictions because closely related species often respond differently. We assess the role of wildlife behavioral responses to traffic volume as a tool to predict barrier effects from vehicle‐caused mortality and avoidance, to provide an early warning system that recognizes traffic volume as a trigger for mitigation, and to better interpret roadkill data. We propose four categories of behavioral response based on the perceived danger to traffic: Nonresponders, Pausers, Speeders, and Avoiders. Nonresponders attempt to cross highways regardless of traffic volume. Pausers stop in the face of danger so have a low probability of successful crossing when traffic volume increases. Hence, highway barrier effects are primarily due to mortality for Nonresponders and Pausers at high traffic volumes. Speeders run away from danger but are unable to do so successfully as traffic volume increases. At moderate to high volume, Speeders are repelled by traffic danger. Avoiders face lower mortality than other categories because they begin to avoid traffic at relatively low traffic volumes. Hence, avoidance causes barrier effects more than mortality for Speeders and Avoiders even at relatively moderate traffic volumes. By considering a species’ risk‐avoidance response to traffic, managers can make more appropriate and timely decisions to mitigate effects before populations decline or become locally extinct.

【 授权许可】

Unknown