Precariousness and Philosophical Critique: Towards an Open-Field Combat with Harman’s OOO

Open Philosophy

Arnaut André¹ 

[1] University of BrasíliaBrasilia, Brazil;

关键词: metaphilosophy;    critique;    metaphysics;    flat ontology;    non-philosophy;    graham harman;    françois laruelle;   

DOI  :  10.1515/opphil-2019-0024

来源: DOAJ

【 摘 要 】

Philosophical critiques are prone to relapse into a sort of entrenchment in which the basic elements of a philosophy are kept from exposure, so that instead of advancing, philosophy easily becomes compartmentalized into specific trends. This article thus seeks the conditions of a non-entrenched, open-field philosophical critique in general and, in particular, of an open-field critique of Harman’s OOO (object-oriented ontology). For that purpose, the idea of precariousness is introduced, which is then confronted with some ideas concerning philosophical critique and practice, in particular those of François Laruelle. Since we can find in Harman’s OOO an outline of what we call here an open-field critique, the field of combat against Harman will be the one concerning the idea of an open field itself.

【 授权许可】

Unknown